This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 2546–2560, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.237
Figure 1: (a) Scanning electron microscopy image of a sensor realization consisting of a silicon microcantile...
Figure 2: Calculated microcantilever amplitude response curve of the co-resonantly coupled system based on th...
Figure 3: (a) Resonance amplitudes of both resonance peaks of the coupled system calculated for the microcant...
Figure 4: This diagram represents the necessary calculation steps to determine the effective spring constant ...
Figure 5: Effective spring constants for both resonance peaks of the coupled system in dependence on the eige...
Figure 6: Effective quality factor for both resonance peaks of the coupled system in dependence on the eigenf...
Figure 7: Qualitative behaviour of the effective quality factor for both resonance peaks of the coupled syste...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 1033–1043, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.96
Figure 1: Simple model for two coupled harmonic oscillators, each represented by a mass (m1, m2), a sping (k1...
Figure 2: Calculated amplitude response for the cantilever (subsystem 1) with and without frequency matching ...
Figure 3: SEM images (a) of the fabricated sensor, (b) and (c) of the free end of the FeCNT before and after ...
Figure 4: Sketch of measurement positions which are reached by keeping the sensor position fixed and rotating...
Figure 5: Simulated magnetic field of the permanent magnet. The field dependence on the distance to the surfa...
Figure 6: Amplitude response curves of the cantilever measured at the field-free position (3) according to Figure 4 a...
Figure 7: Measured frequency shifts of both peaks (a) and (b) compared to the field free measurement for vari...
Figure 8: Dependence of the effective spring constant of each peak on the interaction spring constant k3. Th...